Le buone non sono servite a nulla: l’estensione dell’obbligo di rettifica previsto dalla legge sulla stampa del 1948 ai blog sta per diventare legge. E nella sua versione originaria, che prevede una sanzione fino a 12.500 euro per qualunque gestore di siti informatici “ivi compresi i giornali quotidiani e periodici diffusi per via telematica” che non proceda alla rettifica entro 48 ore dalla richiesta e secondo precisi criteri di grafici, di posizionamento e visibilità. Gli emendamenti proposti al testo del comma contenente la norma (il 29 dell’articolo 1), sia quelli abrogativi avanzati dal PD che quelli migliorativi, come quello dell’On. Cassinelli del PDL, sono stati ritenuti infatti “inammissibili” dall’On. Bongiorno. Con un provvedimento that the lawyer Guido Scorza not hesitate to describe as "lapidary" and "almost no motivation." To add insult to injury, all this comes just as "marks the gag the press, thanks to the votes of PD and UDC amendment of the Government. That of course does not contain any provision on the Net in the battle waged by the newspapers in recent months, moreover, only if they have never read almost anything. As if freedom of expression in our country is not measured today, and increasingly in the future on the Internet.
say "good" because the attempt, initially, was to try a far ragionare il legislatore. Metterlo di fronte ad argomenti, a dati di fatto. Ad esempio che sia errato equiparare un blog qualsiasi a una testata registrata. Che sia errato mettere sullo stesso piano la diffusione professionale e amatoriale di notizie. Che sia inconcepibile pretendere da chiunque apra un sito per esprimere liberamente la propria opinione che non possa assentarsi dalla propria pagina per un fine settimana senza rischiare di trovarsi con migliaia di euro da pagare. Che sia antistorico credere che una legge concepita nel 1948 possa cogliere adeguatamente le dinamiche dell’informazione online. Che sia barbaro disincentivare la libera circolazione delle idee, instillare la paura e il sospetto in those who challenge the "gag" and provide an additional means of intimidation to those in power, which could shake the threat of correction - with all the ensuing legal bandwagon - any unwelcome news. many bloggers who write for the vast majority without drawing a euro in their business activities rather investing much of their free time, would be willing to bear the costs appropriate to demonstrate the soundness of its news? few. The others will eventually fold. SINCE maybe even register with some "authority" (the court, Agcom or whatever) to make themselves available in case of trouble. Truth be told, in short, may not be enough to sleep soundly.
Now therefore, speak up. All together. Because this is not the first attempt to put the "gag" the Net, and of course - as it is to succeed - will not be the last. Yesterday, with the excuse of security has been bureaucratized as in any country free access to public places and on the move. Today, under the pretext of respect for the truth has made a decisive step forward perhaps the duty, to approve the adjustment. Tomorrow it could tap to preventive filters and new offenses created specifically for the Web To hit the Net and in particular social networks, the potential for dissent bothers to who the information is used to control it as he pleases. Bills are already there, just brush up - or create yet another media scandal on the net because it is legitimate to do so. Adopt such measures is a trend in more and more countries in the world - but none of them is a democratic country. Today was another small shift in the direction of China, Burma and Iran. But it must be the last.
We urge all bloggers to all readers, anyone who cares that the Net remains, despite all its shortcomings, as it is to say no. to say enough. before being reduced to a large television (even on this the first steps have already been made). Before becoming a place of conversation a megaphone. We ask to all those newspapers that have so far withheld the existence of this section, without even taking a position. As if this were not a decisive debate on the future of freedom. Well, it's time to take sides, and do it now, because time is running out. It's time to say Hon. Bongiorno and Parliament that if something is "unacceptable" this is normal. What non piace all’opposizione e nemmeno – e qui si rasenta il farsesco – a larghi settori della maggioranza, che pure l’ha proposta. Dimostriamo al legislatore che non piace alla Rete e alla società civile. Chiediamogli di abrogare il comma 29. Prima che faccia danni irreparabili.
say "good" because the attempt, initially, was to try a far ragionare il legislatore. Metterlo di fronte ad argomenti, a dati di fatto. Ad esempio che sia errato equiparare un blog qualsiasi a una testata registrata. Che sia errato mettere sullo stesso piano la diffusione professionale e amatoriale di notizie. Che sia inconcepibile pretendere da chiunque apra un sito per esprimere liberamente la propria opinione che non possa assentarsi dalla propria pagina per un fine settimana senza rischiare di trovarsi con migliaia di euro da pagare. Che sia antistorico credere che una legge concepita nel 1948 possa cogliere adeguatamente le dinamiche dell’informazione online. Che sia barbaro disincentivare la libera circolazione delle idee, instillare la paura e il sospetto in those who challenge the "gag" and provide an additional means of intimidation to those in power, which could shake the threat of correction - with all the ensuing legal bandwagon - any unwelcome news. many bloggers who write for the vast majority without drawing a euro in their business activities rather investing much of their free time, would be willing to bear the costs appropriate to demonstrate the soundness of its news? few. The others will eventually fold. SINCE maybe even register with some "authority" (the court, Agcom or whatever) to make themselves available in case of trouble. Truth be told, in short, may not be enough to sleep soundly.
Now therefore, speak up. All together. Because this is not the first attempt to put the "gag" the Net, and of course - as it is to succeed - will not be the last. Yesterday, with the excuse of security has been bureaucratized as in any country free access to public places and on the move. Today, under the pretext of respect for the truth has made a decisive step forward perhaps the duty, to approve the adjustment. Tomorrow it could tap to preventive filters and new offenses created specifically for the Web To hit the Net and in particular social networks, the potential for dissent bothers to who the information is used to control it as he pleases. Bills are already there, just brush up - or create yet another media scandal on the net because it is legitimate to do so. Adopt such measures is a trend in more and more countries in the world - but none of them is a democratic country. Today was another small shift in the direction of China, Burma and Iran. But it must be the last.
We urge all bloggers to all readers, anyone who cares that the Net remains, despite all its shortcomings, as it is to say no. to say enough. before being reduced to a large television (even on this the first steps have already been made). Before becoming a place of conversation a megaphone. We ask to all those newspapers that have so far withheld the existence of this section, without even taking a position. As if this were not a decisive debate on the future of freedom. Well, it's time to take sides, and do it now, because time is running out. It's time to say Hon. Bongiorno and Parliament that if something is "unacceptable" this is normal. What non piace all’opposizione e nemmeno – e qui si rasenta il farsesco – a larghi settori della maggioranza, che pure l’ha proposta. Dimostriamo al legislatore che non piace alla Rete e alla società civile. Chiediamogli di abrogare il comma 29. Prima che faccia danni irreparabili.
Pubblicizziamo al massimo questa informazione...più siamo più la"voce" si alzerà contro queste indecenze.
Non capisco neanche più l'opposizione,specie ilPD che mi sembra davvero il PDmenoL.....
Si potrebbero mandare anche delle e-mail to the secretariat of the party ... or whatever.
Let idee.Ci wants to be the mobilization. Resist Resist Resist
0 comments:
Post a Comment