Natlaie Morales Hairstyles

ESSERE O NON ESSERE

Politics is a well polluted, we need clean water sources that feed streams and rivers of sap lively, bubbly, can restore hope and perspective.

those stinging words of Don Ciotti.

The parties are in disarray, indifferent, uninterested in the common good.

fugitives, lost, unable to idealize, design, build a possible future in the face of the serious situation we find ourselves.

Finding a balance unlikely they are afraid to take sides, to declare which side they are with the political agenda dictated by the media led and addressed by the political grim, gray, black, conniving, interested to defend the interest of a few.

degradation social, cultural, environmental impact of our city, our country is under the eyes of all.

fooled in his own self, try to float, to preserve and maintain positions and privileges acquired, without the prospect of higher thought, without the prospect of a future for all.

With this in mind you can only back, back, back, lose.

The reflection we find in our daily lives: inertia, indifference, neutrality, silence in the face of injustice, self-interest, ..., are the masters.

We have to react.
We need a cultural change. It is urgent.

In this climate of de-legitimization, with this understanding, increase, like it or not, the responsibility of local governments. Local governments have a responsibility to lead by example, to take charge of their communities.
A positive revolution capable of infecting, from our cities, the government of our country. A kind of domino positive.

We get out to go to us, to the collective self-interest.
Today more than ever.

striking and emblematic example of this context is Peace.

Peace is no longer fashionable.

For this reason or the pretext of tight economiche viene cancellata dalla politica, dai programmi, dalle iniziative. La pace è vissuta come qualcosa di lontano per cui, anche se taglio le risorse, nessuno si lamenta.

Al contrario è proprio la Pace, nella sua accezione più ampia, il modo per scegliere un altro modo di agire, vicino alla gente, ai problemi reali, all’ambiente.

Scegliere la Pace significa iniziare a scegliere la pace nelle nostre città, nelle nostre relazioni ed azioni quotidiane.

Ecco allora alcune tracce per iniziare a lavorare insieme.

1. Nelle nostre città pace si coniuga con giustizia sociale. Dobbiamo lavorare per ricostruire le nostre Comunità, communities that include and exclude, who can take care of the weakest, who have to care about the environment in which they live.
2. peace with our people build real integration paths. Immigrants are only considered different and are not considered equal. We have to start from the similarities, the things that unite us to discover the differences are able to respect each other culture and customs.
3. Peace with land that welcomes us, knowing that the environment is constructed by choosing social justice. The easy short-cuts in energy policies, water, climate, land, ... inequality and lead damage is often irreversible.
4. Peace in the administrative life is transparency, fairness, quality, procurement, services, in decisions in everyday actions.

But this is just the beginning, we have to regain communication. The information is perceived as a danger that issues such as environment, health, employment, immigration, security, ..., are removed or, worse, the press service of the master.

We have to spread the good news, the possible routes but also the difficulties, taking care to offer a perspective as possible.

Demand and with whom, how and when to start this process. Connecting men and women of good will, good practice in building a network, a system that helps not to be isolated, but becomes a force for change, a tsunami can clear the way to the prevailing policy.

It is not easy, but today more than ever, we must choose whether
... ... or may not be.

Mario Galasso

Retina Attatchment Operation

Responsabilità CivileRoma, 6 e 7 marzoPROGRAMMA

Crisis of policy, what are our responsibilities?
What should people who, every day, strives to build a country and a better world?

PROGRAM WORKS

Roma 6 / 7 March 2010

Saturday morning → (h . 10/13.30)

first session

questions

intervention of one of the signatories - introduces questions

intervention summary of the debate from the blog

moderates Elisa Marincola

first speech prepared Roberto Morrione

interventions to follow

lunch together

Saturday afternoon → (h 15/20)

seconda sessione proposte

che cosa può fare la società civile

per costruire una nuova politica

breve introduzione del moderatore Flavio Lotti

interventi

domenica mattina → (h. 9.30-13)

terza sessione

perspective and path

presentation summary of the day on Saturday

moderates Luciano Scalettari

operations perspective

conclusion at work

REGISTRATION FORM

Free Online Make Your Own Person

Legge elettorale, nelle mani dei “capetti”: che senso ha votare?

There is no doubt, to talk about electoral reform these days sounds démodé . Or maybe it's just fatigue. After two referendum elections (plus one failed) and two reforms in less than twenty years, we are left with the worst of both systems and a Parliament fell into contempt. Everyone agrees, the parliamentarians are too many, to be paid less. The only reform on which everyone agrees is to reduce the numbers. Well. But to do that? Few remember what good and what is the Parliament. Call Richard Lenzi to discuss reforms true, what people want, I would answer talking about electoral reform. In my opinion this is the most urgently needed reform of all, to secure democracy. The low esteem in which Parliament has fallen to the project is functional populist Berlusconi.

The current electoral law, immortalized by the artist himself as a solemn "bullshit", was made to please the party leaders, all - without taking any account of the will of the voters.

I participated in an election, the first, held in 2006, with the same rules, and I decided that would be the last. It is a system designed to deceive the party leaders and Capetti bloodless that having the power to appoint the members of Parliament, still count for something in the country. The disaster was announced and even palpable, since the formation of lists. At the time of voting for the change of electoral system had dropped a cloak of complicity transverse, despite the shock in Europe. Changing the rules of the game a few weeks before the vote, as the former Berlusconi government was doing, was an operation worthy of a Caucasian republic. But Berlusconi and his allies were sure to lose with the majority system then in force, and changed without circled around too. I never capacitive ease with which they succeeded. The "porch" Calderoli passed the House in three days.

The old electoral system, the much-deprecated 'mattarellum', was the result of a referendum battle made in the name of renewal. That promise, however, was not honored. Even with the majority parties continued to carve up the nominations. Indeed, with the excuse of the coalition, jumped the mechanisms now residual of democratic participation in the selection of candidates within parties. The primaries were never seriously contemplated, as well voters resigned. And someone, I add, if they took advantage. Despite its shortcomings, the electoral law had the merit of forcing parties to choose candidates with sufficient thickness to support a head to head battle in the area. Voters, in turn, knew who had elected to account and to whom.

During the last Prodi government, there was a brief discussion on electoral reform rudimentary, with little result. All parties, without exception, proved unable to contemplate a different horizon than the right, a small gain. Nobody, not even the small parties of the left Rainbow, had the courage to face the next election, even European ones, with candidates chosen by a method of transparency and participation. A field of rubble, no doubt about it. Difficult in this context, to know where to start.

In the absence of other suggestions from the words of Casini, the only leader, as I understand it, to talk about electoral reform at this time. What Casini calls (I did it again during his recent appearance at Che tempo che fa ) is the German electoral system. We know why he does: he wants a system to facilitate its strategic plan, establishment of a center block, led by his party, which is indispensable to any coalition government. Neither more nor less than good old politics of the two furnaces dear to the centrists of the First Republic. At the point where we're at, with the legitimization of racism in the government and the State and its institutions to private interests bent of the President of the Council, a smooth return to corruption of the First Republic could also indicate a comforting prospect. But let's not impressed. I suggest you take Casini word. Go, therefore, for the German electoral system. Provided, however, to take it as such, as it is implemented in Germany.

The only adjustment I would propose to the electoral system in that country is a small change to avoid an unexpected event that is accepted by them: the number of MPs may change from time to time, depending on the result of the vote. A possibility ruled out by the Italian Constitution, which fixed by law the number of members of both chambers.

the remainder of the German electoral system should be just fine. The German Constitution, like ours, was written in the aftermath of World War II, with the same desire to restore democracy and the rule right of the best antibodies to totalitarian tendencies that had brought that country to the brink of Nazism, as well as our Constitution was designed in response to the disaster mirror of fascism. Unlike the Italian, however, the German Constitution is the fundamental law of a federal state, with institutions and balances designed to ensure the independence, without risking the drive. Even so, faced with the disruptive forces at work in Italy, I look forward to the German model.

Just as the Italian law, the German electoral system was not constitutionalized, the applicable law may, therefore, be changed by ordinary law. The fact that no one dreamed of doing for more than fifty years demonstrates the continuing validity. The law was written in 1956, at the dawn of the new Bundeswehr , in one of those rare moments in the history of states where legislators are not encumbered by the weight of the interest of part: no one had yet clear which system would have helped at the expense of others. The result is a system that balances beautifully, in my view, the democratic principle of representation with the need for governance. It is a system of proportional representation, with two important corrective: a clause of five per cent barrier, mitigated, in turn, the possibility of voting for candidates in single-member constituency, an option that can lead to the election of MPs whose parties have not reached the quorum national level. It was thanks to this system, for example, that the strongest candidates of the Green dragged his party in the Bundestag, before reaching the threshold of 5%. The possibility of voting in single-member constituency the candidate has the undoubted advantage of allowing a more direct relationship between elector and elected.

But the law in force in Germany would another innovation to our democracy asphyxiated sacrosanct: to reach the electoral reimbursements in that country, candidates for the election must be chosen through a public process and participated.

Enough, I think, to give a reason Casini. Ben is, therefore, the German electoral system. A system that no party, no matter how small, should fear, if you have the courage of their ideas. But to maintain its validity can not be adopted in part or whole, including primary, or nothing.

TANA DE ZULUETA

Pain In My Throat Transferred To Earache

Cambiamo la politica da dentro.

Io continuo a credere nell'impegno politico ed in particolare nel PD. Sono convintissimo che molto è stato sbagliato e moltissimo andrebbe cambiato ma non sono assolutamente d'accordo sul fatto che siano i partiti a snobbare la società civile.

Secondo me è vero il contrario.

Certo io che mi ritengo molto "civile" e mi sento parte appieno della società capisco chi si è scocciato e disamorato. Io ho fatto una scelta different and I continue to struggle within the parties x try to change society by making it more sensitive attention to the last, wherever they are and therefore more "civilized." We do not succeed, I know but stubbornly keep trying, and frankly I would invite representatives of civil society to make a different choice: enter in and contribute to change, not just let people like me who already tries! My big fear is that "calling out" hold your hands free to Casini (gosh) to Berlusconi (double gosh) and Emanuele Filiberto (triple gosh)! Look, as in the study, rather than in the associations, jobs, etc. even in politics is true that there are the children of fathers, the elect and the useful idiots, but who wants to do and who does (and we re-enter in both categories) at the end is always able to tell her. Remember that not doing politics and not vote paved the way for the above categories that are there, look at us and grinning.

Giorgio Basta

White Strands In Urine

L'Italia e la Responsabilità Civile

5 and 6 September 2009 held a first meeting held in name of Liability. This is my summary of what had been said in occasion.

Francesco Cavalli

Rome, 5 and 6 September 2009

ITALY, THE WORLD AND THE LIABILITY 'CIVIL

Concern for the World, the global issues brings us to the urgency Italy. The more we worry about the World and the more we realize that we must Italy worry about.

Today there is a move away from increasing international issues, from the world, as the world continues to fall in our daily lives more and more. This Italian company always brings more to close, and knows no fear closes, rejects, erect walls.

policy does not address most of the world, refused to understand and worry about the world.

This creates a lack of dialogue and forced to simplify what is complex.

The crisis is not only politics, the crisis exists in society, the organized part of society.

Until a bit 'of years ago would have been the associations, the so-called civil society organizations, to meet to address this urgent crisis of society. The fact that we are here instead as free citizens is the litmus test of social crisis itself.

Hence the transition from civil society organizations to "civil liability".

drift to which we are witnessing it is also our fault. We are not blind and we have not been, but we knowingly impotent or powerless to make this happen. Why? Why do not we put together. Because we each tried on their own, with its own organization, association or anything else to take care of your garden and we've put together the theme of how we could affect a lot more.

FROM WHO DOES THINGS

It continues to say things, to announce the contents and actions that never translate in the making. We are in the age ad rejected.

In the society of communication, it does not matter what you do, but what you say, what ads, then no matter if you do it or not.

Then when you go from saying to do, the problem becomes how to turn that into a media event. Do the same is hereby amended by the concern of how to communicate as effectively say what you are doing. Almost never the real concern is how to make effective the action you are doing.

Hence the key, or from better to start from the responsible company is doing. From those fa delle cose, da chi si occupano davvero delle persone.

Un primo obiettivo è quello di tentare di riconnettere chi ha responsabilità politiche con chi fa delle cose, con chi opera della responsabilità sociale e civile.

I cittadini vogliono essere protagonisti delle scelte. C'è una nuova comunità da ricostruire, un nuovo senso, una nuova idea di comunità.

Non basta più impegnarsi personalmente. Oggi la responsabilità è di trovare al nostro fare uno sbocco politico. L'obiettivo, l'ambizione deve essere quella di change the balance of power.

We have to be, and we are already saying those who do. Departing from doing things, but do not give up and say to say politically. You do that a widely understood in the third sector has put in place in a fantasy reality, articulate and very beautiful.

By doing this the last two decades there has been a great road traveled. But he withdrew all'incisività policy. Liability as a transformation of this done, the result of a sense of responsibility assumed, in incisive social policy and civil note. That this multitude of people who are civil society and responsabile passano diventare partecipazione politica che incide.

Responsabilità che diventa allora stile e metodo ma che è in sé anche proposta. Ci sono molte altre persone in Italia con le quali è possibile fare un percorso insieme. È necessario allargare questa base con le tante persone di buona volontà che ci sono sparse per tutto il paese. C'è un'Italia intera di dinamismo sociale vero, questa è la speranza per il futuro.

LA CHIAVE CULTURALE

La crisi culturale is well thought out. It is a fatal consequence of uncontrolled evolution of the system of mass communication where television has played and continues to play the role. The drift-cultural media is more effective on the substrate as does the new fascism. Individualism, personal success, social climbing, money at all costs, this cultural-media system was and is incompatible with Catholic thought, too bad that has raged for 20years without not noticing.

The left seems to have the strength to oppose alternative values.

lacks a strong culture and differs from the standardization media and individualistic.

Even the information must always be taken in the cultural features it has. Often this information will depend on political and cultural project.

There is also a direct link between the cultural drift and the economy. Instead of investing in research and social growth based on a true progress for all, the focus has been investment in the direction of the economy where individualism is good for those who succeed and those who can not do it is outside.

If this is the situation of cultural crisis, and social, and political, the different expressions of civil society organizations, trade unions or associations and various other social and economic living this crisis, these contradictions within them.

The educational challenge

The key is in the community in the idea of \u200b\u200bcommunity. Here's the whole challenge of education and the priority of education, school.

In respect of the younger generations, we must ask ourselves the question of culture in which they grew up, what are the references with which they are grown. The concern then is to give other references. Retrieve references for adults, for young people is to propose new reference values. The reflection on values \u200b\u200bis the starting point. The school as a true training ground for life, democracy.

Today the dominant culture is that of "Friends." To this the only possible alternative is a real school gym culture.

The example is not relevant, consistency is no longer valid because the weight of the communication revolution around the ad's approach to politics and society.

CLEAR RULES AND ALTERNATIVE PROPOSALS

If there are no rules for democratic participation clear and incisive, from our facilities, we risk falling into the beautiful speeches, announcements beautiful but no effective results.

is no longer possible criticism and contestation as sacrosanct, but no real proposals possible. We must replace the complaints and criticisms with alternative proposals.

The needs should be converted into rights to claim. If it is steered this need for critical and a challenge, the risk is to escalate into violence.

Change the agenda is the key issue. The problem of the political agenda is the problem. Today the policy agenda set outside chasing him rather than to dictate the agenda itself.

The disaffection with politics - for some - is also a consequence of the fact that some political friends of the past have used the political ideal locations for personal giving and to maintain fidelity to the relationship and the original location.

DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS

1. Putting together

There are many people in the leg in Italy today. Many people we know and do. We must try to piece together as much as possible the many people of good policy that we know, there are. What is the contribution that civil society organizations and responsible can give today is really the policy?

Widen involvement with the personal touch, reminding us that what we have to offer is a proposal for participation of non-adherence.

To do this we must take action to work in the territories. Suggest that even small meetings and more people get together in each territory.

not forget that other, fortunately, many others are doing the other important roads.

We need to find reliable political partners with whom to do a job.

2. Work on the U.S.

the U.S. we are using in fact does not exist. We need to first work sul NOI. Ciascuno sa che cosa crede e verso cosa vuole camminare, ma non abbiamo ancora lavorato su di una base forte condivisa. Come prima cosa per avere poi forza nel percorso dobbiamo dare forza ed identità di contenuti e proposte a questo NOI.

Dobbiamo diventare un gruppo di pressione, innanzitutto nei confronti dei cittadini prima ancora che nei confronti della politica.

Il come darci delle regole di gestione di Responsabilità Civile diventa già una proposta di un modo di far politica.

3. Laboratorio

Essere un laboratorio o stanza di compensazione where we compare and policy-making becomes true then bringing the fruits in the policy areas of daily life, people in the associations, who in the party, who in his work and the economy. Let us help to think "new" no substitute for political parties.

The laboratory is also the instrument to discuss and develop Italy we want.

4. Italy we want

idea for a new policy, participation, democracy, we need to first define the "how" we mean that this Liability "as" may already be a talk and represent a operativamente la politica che vogliamo, quella che intendiamo fare, l'Italia che vogliamo.

È emersa più volte la necessità di partire da una carta, un primo documento di riferimento, che abbia da un a parte l'ambizione di iniziare a delineare l'Italia che vogliamo, dall'altra la concretezza di partire da alcuni punti precisi e non dallo scibile umano.

Temi da dove partire: diritti umani e immigrazione, sfida culturale, scuola ed educazione, economia e lavoro, mondo, pace e cooperazione.

How Do You Get Herpes In The Nose?

Responsabilità Civileil 6 e 7 marzo a Roma.

Crisi della politica: quali sono le nostre responsabilità?
What should people who, every day, strives to build a country and a better world?

's meet and talk on 6 and 7 March 2010 in Rome .

REGISTRATION FORM